Search

Case on misappropriation of funds from state grain procurement enterprises

  • The date of the first court decision within a pre-trial investigation: 14/01/2022
  • Instance: HACC
  • Stage of criminal proceedings: Pre-trial investigation
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
Case on misappropriation of funds from state grain procurement enterprises Case on misappropriation of funds from state grain procurement enterprises

Case description

The HACC found the management of several state grain procurement enterprises guilty of embezzling nearly UAH 50 million and causing an additional UAH 20 million in damages.

According to the investigation, the defendants, in cooperation with affiliated private companies, orchestrated a scheme to create artificial debt for state enterprises. Funds and claims obtained illegally were transferred through a complex chain of transactions and assignments to controlled entities, including foreign-registered firms.

Key defendants:

  • Andrii Yakovenko, former director of Novopokrovsk Grain Processing Plant
  • Dmytro Hostrenko, former director of the state-owned Nizhyn Grain Processing Plant
  • Yevhen Svystunov, former head of Barvinkove Grain Processing Plant LLC
  • Svitlana Bulychova, former head of Agro-Industrial Union of Kharkiv Region LLC
  • Oleh Mohylnyi, former head of Agromlynprom PE
  • Nadiia Bulychova, former head of a private enterprise
  • Serhii Korostyliov, attorney.

The scheme worked as follows: state-owned enterprises signed supply or service contracts with fictitious or inflated values. The resulting debts were formally recorded on the companies’ balance sheets, and claims were reassigned to intermediary firms.

The funds and assets were then moved through a chain of affiliated companies, some of which were registered abroad, to conceal the true ownership and origin of the money. This created a closed system for legally withdrawing state assets without direct alienation.

One particular episode involved Nizhyn Grain Processing Plant: between 2012 and 2014, its management signed loss-making contracts that artificially increased liabilities, which were then transferred to affiliated firms. This provided a basis for further court claims and asset misappropriation.

A similar mechanism operated at Novopokrovsk Grain Processing Plant, where fictitious contracts and inflated service prices created artificial creditor debt. As a result, the enterprise lost control over a significant portion of its assets.

Another episode related to Bread Base No. 85 involved the reassignment of inflated, but formally valid, financial obligations to “third-party” companies actually controlled by the same individuals. This established a closed-loop scheme through which state assets were placed under the control of private entities.

The defendants were charged under Article 191(5) of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The HACC approved a plea agreement and found them guilty. The verdict is not yet available in the official registry. Andrii Yakovenko was sentenced to 7 years of imprisonment with a 3-year probationary period. Yevhen Svystunov — 7 years of suspended sentence with a 2.5-year probation. Dmytro Hostrenko, Svitlana Bulychkova, Oleh Mohylnyi, and Serhii Korostyliov — 4 years of imprisonment with a 2.5-year probation.

The defendants are required to write off a UAH 31.53 million debt of Novopokrovsk Grain Processing Plant to a Slovak company; compensate UAH 49.85 million in damages; transfer the trademark “Pokrovchanka” to the state, valued at UAH 19.83 million; transfer UAH 9 million, €40,850, and $21,500 for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, they are required to transfer assets into state, municipal, or territorial ownership in the interest of the state enterprise Novopokrovsk Grain Processing Plant.

The HACC had earlier approved plea agreements with Oleksii Mytrokhin, representing Boroshno Pokrovske LLC, and Liudmyla Shashkova, former head of the state-owned Bread Base No. 85.

  • Proceeding No.: 52018000000000461
  • Case No.: 991/201/22, 991/313/22, 991/574/22, 991/1140/22, 991/3202/23, 991/4074/23, 991/4674/23, 991/4811/23, 991/5134/23, 991/6418/23, 991/5784/23, 991/10139/23, 991/128/24, 991/10524/23, 991/2712/24, 991/8307/24
  • Incriminated: Article 191, part 5, Article 364, part 2, Article 209, part 3
Instance
The case is at the stage of pre-trial investigation

Infographics

CASE OF APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM GRAIN PROCESSING ENTERPRISES

According to the investigation, the management of state-owned grain procurement enterprises, in cooperation with affiliated private companies, organized a scheme to artificially create debt for the state enterprises, while the illegally obtained funds and claims were transferred through a complex chain of assignments to companies under their control, including those registered abroad.

  • pic
    2011–2017
    Defendants allegedly established an artificial debt scheme involving state-owned grain enterprises and affiliated firms
  • May 15, 2018
    Pre-trial investigation launched
  • pic
    December 13, 2021
    Defendants formally notified of suspicion
  • June 1, 2023
    The HACC authorized in absentia proceedings for Svitlana Bulychova
  • June 2, 2023
    The HACC authorized in absentia proceedings for Andrii Yakovenko
  • September 3, 2024
    Case referred to court
  • February 19, 2025
    The HACC found the defendants guilty

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
991/201/22 HACC 14/01/2022
991/201/22 HACC 14/01/2022
991/313/22 HACC 20/01/2022
991/313/22 HACC 20/01/2022
991/201/22 HACC AC 21/01/2022
991/201/22 HACC AC 31/01/2022
991/201/22 HACC AC 31/01/2022
991/574/22 HACC 03/02/2022
991/574/22 HACC 10/02/2022
991/574/22 HACC 18/02/2022
991/574/22 HACC 24/02/2022
991/1140/22 HACC 04/04/2022
991/1140/22 HACC 04/04/2022
991/3202/23 HACC 13/04/2023
991/3202/23 HACC 17/04/2023
991/3202/23 HACC 17/04/2023
991/4074/23 HACC AC 16/05/2023
991/4074/23 HACC 19/05/2023
991/4074/23 HACC AC 19/05/2023
991/4674/23 HACC 31/05/2023
991/4674/23 HACC 02/06/2023
991/4674/23 HACC 02/06/2023
991/4811/23 HACC 05/06/2023
991/5134/23 HACC 13/06/2023
991/5134/23 HACC 15/06/2023
991/5134/23 HACC 15/06/2023
991/4811/23 HACC 21/06/2023
991/4811/23 HACC 21/06/2023
991/6418/23 HACC 18/07/2023
991/5784/23 HACC 20/07/2023
991/10139/23 HACC 22/11/2023
991/128/24 HACC 12/01/2024
991/10524/23 HACC 27/02/2024
991/10524/23 HACC AC 04/03/2024
991/10524/23 HACC AC 21/03/2024
991/10524/23 HACC 15/04/2024
991/2712/24 HACC 16/10/2024
991/2712/24 HACC 16/10/2024
991/8307/24 HACC AC 06/11/2024 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
991/2712/24 HACC 12/11/2024
991/2712/24 HACC AC 18/11/2024
991/2712/24 HACC AC 18/11/2024 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
991/2712/24 HACC AC 18/11/2024
991/8307/24 CCC 13/01/2025 On the refusal to open cassation proceedings
991/8307/24 HACC 04/06/2025
991/8307/24 HACC 27/06/2025
991/8307/24 HACC 27/06/2025
991/8307/24 HACC 12/08/2025