Search

The case of embezzlement of more than UAH 98 million from JSC Ukrzaliznytsiaia

  • Date of commencement of the case: 23/09/2019
  • Instance: HACC
  • Stage of criminal proceedings: Preparatory proceedings
Track case progress If you would like to follow the case, leave your email and get updates sent straight to your inbox
The case of embezzlement of more than UAH 98 million from JSC Ukrzaliznytsiaia The case of embezzlement of more than UAH 98 million from JSC Ukrzaliznytsiaia

Case description

The HACC found the defendants guilty in the “Silk Road” case of embezzling more than UAH 98 million from JSC Ukrzaliznytsia during the procurement of fuel at inflated prices.

According to the investigation, in 2016–2017, officials of the Lysky Transport Service Center branch of Ukrzaliznytsia abused their positions and embezzled UAH 98.2 million by formally documenting non-commodity transactions for the purchase of naval fuel oil and diesel fuel from Skela Tercium LLC.

The case involves:

  • Ruslan Husak — head of the Lysky branch

  • Oleksii Shevchenko — chief engineer of the branch

  • Valerii Vovk — first deputy head of the Odesa branch of the Lysky Transport Service Center

  • Inna Dyshliuk — chief engineer of the Odesa branch of the Lysky Transport Service Center

Picture

According to the investigation, Husak signed a payment order for UAH 14 million for diesel fuel that was never delivered and passed it to the accounting department. Together with Shevchenko, he signed a request for centralized financing for another UAH 34 million, creating only the documentary appearance of fuel delivery.

The documents signed by the defendants artificially confirmed the presence of fuel. The inventory commission, unaware of the absence of the product, prepared reports based on custodial receipts from Skela Tercium.

When the NABU investigation began, the defendants introduced false data into documents to demonstrate the formal return of fuel that never existed. They later arranged the actual delivery of small volumes of fuel to Heroi Shypky and Heroi Plevny ferries, indicating false storage locations in documents while real shipments occurred from other facilities.

These actions included falsifying payment orders, invoices, acceptance and transfer certificates and reports, which allowed them to embezzle company funds on a large scale and conceal their unlawful activity from oversight bodies.

The HACC found the defendants guilty. The court sentenced Ruslan Husak to 9 years of imprisonment with a 3-year ban on holding executive positions and confiscation of all property. Oleksii Shevchenko received the same sentence. Valerii Vovk and Inna Dyshliuk were each sentenced to 8 years of imprisonment with the same restrictions and confiscation of property. The court rejected JSC Ukrzaliznytsia’s civil claim.

The appeal review is ongoing.

In addition, in 2020 the HACC reported an attempt of unlawful influence on the panel of judges. According to the court, before a ruling on the merits was issued, defendant Ruslan Husak together with his lawyers filed a statement to the Prosecutor General accusing the judges of allegedly issuing a knowingly unjust ruling. Based on these claims, they also filed motions to recuse the judges, which the HACC regarded as interference aimed at obstructing the proceedings.

  • Proceeding No.: 52017000000000618
  • Case No.: 910/304/19
  • Incriminated: Article 191, part 5, Article 209, part 3, Article 366, part 1
Instance Key parties Instance /Key parties:
HACC AC
05/06/2025

Panel of judges: Panaid I.V.

HACC
23/09/2019

Panel of judges: Strohyi I.L.

Infographics

The case of embezzlement of more than UAH 98 million from JSC Ukrzaliznytsiaia

According to the investigation, officials of the Lysky branch of JSC Ukrzaliznytsia embezzled UAH 98.2 million by documenting non-commodity transactions for fuel procurement from Skela Tercium LLC.

  • pic
    2016–2017
    Officials of the Lysky branch allegedly embezzled UAH 98.2 million
  • October 18, 2017
    Pre-trial investigation was launched
  • pic
    January 17, 2019
    All defendants were served with a notice of suspicion
  • pic
    September 20, 2019
    The case was referred to the court
  • September 23, 2019
    The HACC scheduled a preparatory hearing
  • October 23, 2020
    The HACC reported an attempt of unlawful influence on judges
  • pic
    April 30, 2025
    The HACC found the defendants guilty
  • June 5, 2025
    The HACC Appeals Chamber opened appeal proceedings

Decisions from the Register

Case No. Court Decision date Decision type
910/304/19 HACC 23/09/2019 On the appointment of a preparatory court hearing
910/304/19 HACC 08/10/2019
910/304/19 HACC 08/10/2019
910/304/19 HACC 01/11/2019
910/304/19 HACC 01/11/2019
910/304/19 HACC 10/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 14/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 14/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 14/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 24/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 24/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 24/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 27/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC 27/02/2020
910/304/19 HACC AC 16/03/2020 On the refusal to open appeal proceedings
910/304/19 CCC 06/04/2020 On the refusal to open cassation proceedings
910/304/19 HACC 21/05/2020
910/304/19 HACC 05/06/2020 Decision on temporary access
910/304/19 HACC 05/06/2020
910/304/19 HACC 05/06/2020
910/304/19 HACC 05/06/2020 Decision on temporary access
910/304/19 HACC 09/06/2020
910/304/19 HACC 15/06/2020
910/304/19 HACC 18/08/2020
910/304/19 HACC 03/09/2020
910/304/19 HACC 02/10/2020
910/304/19 HACC 19/10/2020
910/304/19 HACC 19/10/2020
910/304/19 HACC 27/11/2020
910/304/19 HACC 19/01/2021
910/304/19 HACC 18/03/2021
910/304/19 HACC 02/06/2021
910/304/19 HACC 07/12/2021
910/304/19 HACC 23/05/2022
910/304/19 HACC 23/05/2022
910/304/19 HACC 31/05/2022 Decision on the return of bail, Decision on closing the criminal proceedings
910/304/19 HACC 31/05/2022 Decision on closing the criminal proceedings, Decision on the return of bail
910/304/19 HACC 18/06/2022
910/304/19 HACC 21/07/2022
910/304/19 HACC 21/07/2022
910/304/19 HACC 21/07/2022
910/304/19 HACC 21/09/2022
910/304/19 HACC 13/10/2022
910/304/19 HACC 15/12/2022
910/304/19 HACC 17/01/2023
910/304/19 HACC 06/02/2023
910/304/19 HACC 13/02/2023
910/304/19 HACC 14/03/2023
910/304/19 HACC 04/04/2023
910/304/19 HACC 05/04/2023
910/304/19 HACC 05/04/2023
910/304/19 HACC 15/05/2023
910/304/19 HACC 01/06/2023
910/304/19 HACC 01/08/2023
910/304/19 HACC 02/08/2023
910/304/19 HACC 02/08/2023
910/304/19 HACC 12/09/2023
910/304/19 HACC 04/06/2024 Decision on closing the criminal proceedings
910/304/19 HACC 04/06/2024 Decision on closing the criminal proceedings
910/304/19 HACC 06/11/2024 Decision on the return of bail
910/304/19 HACC 06/11/2024 Decision on the return of bail
910/304/19 HACC 30/04/2025 Decision to cancel the seizure of property, Verdicts
910/304/19 HACC AC 05/06/2025 Opening of appeal proceedings
910/304/19 HACC AC 16/06/2025
910/304/19 HACC AC 26/06/2025
910/304/19 HACC AC 27/10/2025

YouTube broadcasts of HACC hearings

More
YouTube broadcasts of HACC hearings